The New York Times has always been a liberal publication, but in recent months they have embraced the radical far left.
Their progressive columnists think nothing of pointing fingers at others for sins of the past.
Now it turns out that the family that owns the paper were once slave owners.
Michael Goodwin reports at the New York Post:
TRENDING: Michelle Malkin Attacked by Antifa and Black Lives Matter Thugs at Denver Back the Blue Rally; Sends Law and Order SOS to President Trump
The family that owns the New York Times were slaveholders: Goodwin
It’s far worse than I thought. In addition to the many links between the family that owns the New York Times and the Civil War’s Confederacy, new evidence shows that members of the extended family were slaveholders.
Last Sunday, I recounted that Bertha Levy Ochs, the mother of Times patriarch Adolph S. Ochs, supported the South and slavery. She was caught smuggling medicine to Confederates in a baby carriage and her brother Oscar joined the rebel army.
I have since learned that, according to a family history, Oscar Levy fought alongside two Mississippi cousins, meaning at least three members of Bertha’s family fought for secession.
Adolph Ochs’ own “Southern sympathies” were reflected in the content of the Chattanooga Times, the first newspaper he owned, and then the New York Times. The latter published an editorial in 1900 saying the Democratic Party, which Ochs supported, “may justly insist that the evils of negro suffrage were wantonly inflicted on them.”
Six years later, the Times published a glowing profile of Confederate President Jefferson Davis on the 100th anniversary of his birth, calling him “the great Southern leader.”
How problematic. Will the Times address this?
“Handcuff the cops, tear down statues, rewrite the textbooks, make America the world’s bad guy — that’s what today’s Times is selling. The Times clearly owes its readers a full account of the slave holders and Confederates in its past.” #HypocriteNYTimes https://t.co/ygpRKBRikn
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) July 19, 2020
Recently, we discovered the @Guardian’s founder made his money off the back of slaves
Now it transpires the family that owns @nytimes were slaveholders
It’s almost like the most pious liberals have the biggest skeletons in their closets 🤷🏼♂️ https://t.co/w5vbsuiXIc
— Martin Daubney (@MartinDaubney) July 19, 2020
Family that owns @nytimes also owned slaves, idolized Robert E. Lee, and were buried with Confederate flags on their coffins. So, under the rules of cancel culture, shouldn’t the NY Times now …. cancel itself?https://t.co/dqLULWfifF
— Jim Rickards (@JamesGRickards) July 19, 2020
According to the left’s rules, shouldn’t the NY Times be canceled?
Cross posted from American Lookout.
