Huh.
Now, why oh why would Twitter try and censor Tucker Carlson’s expose on George Soros funding anti-police, pro-crime prosecutors around the country? Gosh, that seems so unlike them.
KIDDING.
SO kidding.
Twitter is censoring Tucker Carlson’s expose on George Soros funding pro-crime, anti-police prosecutors by falsely marking the segment as “sensitive content.” pic.twitter.com/fJOaBRIF0g
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 22, 2020
Sensitive content?
Hrm.
But they’re not censoring people like Reza Aslan threatening all-out war if Trump replaces RBG as ‘sensitive content.’
Go figure.
The Left trying to chill criticism of Soros by making it about anti-Semitism defines chutzpah https://t.co/oPlW4MjUaB
— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) September 22, 2020
Annnd everything is still stupid.
They get away with telling you the Soros stuff is a conspiracy theory because they’re so effective at shutting down any discussion of things he’s actually doing https://t.co/QJBSl2ebYW
— Arthur Bloom 🇺🇸 (@j_arthur_bloom) September 22, 2020
They can act like Soros is a conspiracy theory because they hide any real news coverage of him.
Yup.
C’mon Sean! You should know by now that Kamala Harris’ former press secretary is working for Twitter. @NickPacilio @TuckerCarlson pic.twitter.com/6TMoH7tuT7
— China Owns Joe Biden (@DupontRenegade) September 22, 2020
THAT explains a lot.
The spider web of George Soros leads everywhere.
— Crusader4US (@crusader4US) September 22, 2020
What does “potentially sensitive” even mean? That it might present information or opinion that’s new/different from/counter to what some “sensitive” people currently have? It might trigger some sensitive people? I think it means it’s something GS and his acolytes don’t like.
— Stan Hazen (@StanHazen) September 22, 2020
Something like that.
And there is no way to change the settings so you can see it. I’ve tried. Nothing seems to work
— Red Tailed Hawk (@HawkTailed) September 22, 2020
Because they don’t want you to see it.
Those sensitive content warnings just make me want to watch it more.
— Doogan_Where’s Hunter? (@DooganPh) September 22, 2020
Ridiculous, there is actual and factual data to endorse what he says
— Silvia 🦍 (@silviastar2016) September 22, 2020
But facts are mean, m’kay?
***
Related:
Awww, WASSAMATTA?! Alyssa Milano asks for Twitter’s fav optimism quotes and WHOA NELLY it goes so very wrong
You’re NOT good at this: Blue-check doc says impeached presidents shouldn’t pick SCOTUS justices, trips GLORIOUSLY over Clinton
Class is in session! Guy Benson schools David French on why Republicans should fill RBG seat in fact-filled thread
