Here’s the criminal complaint in the case of State of WIsconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse:
State of Wisconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse
Criminal Complaint (1/5) pic.twitter.com/PnJxnJKy05
— JERRY DUNLEAVY (@JerryDunleavy) August 28, 2020
State of Wisconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse
Criminal Complaint (2/5) pic.twitter.com/zF4nLdrzCI
— JERRY DUNLEAVY (@JerryDunleavy) August 28, 2020
State of Wisconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse
Criminal Complaint (3/5) pic.twitter.com/UqHrgzJYCp
— JERRY DUNLEAVY (@JerryDunleavy) August 28, 2020
State of Wisconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse
Criminal Complaint (4/5) pic.twitter.com/xnItC5tIuZ
— JERRY DUNLEAVY (@JerryDunleavy) August 28, 2020
State of Wisconsin v. Kyle Rittenhouse
Criminal Complaint (5/5) pic.twitter.com/wwLVrjnKWX
— JERRY DUNLEAVY (@JerryDunleavy) August 28, 2020
The Daily Beast covered it. They are a media outlet, after all.
Here’s how:
Got that? Rittenhouse shot and killed two violent rioters because one of them threw a plastic bag at him. Literally nothing else happened.
In case you don’t feel like clicking on the Daily Beast’s scoop, Daily Beast editor Harry Siegel posted a screenshot from their article:
The teen with the AR-15 style rifle in Kenosha was defending himself from a plastic bag when he killed his first victim, according to a criminal complaint obtained by @thedailybeast https://t.co/R8TnWs49qE pic.twitter.com/ZbgVC3AQHu
— Harry Siegel (@harrysiegel) August 28, 2020
A plastic bag. Clearly this proves that Kyle Rittenhouse couldn’t possibly have been acting in self-defense and was just out for blood.
Seems like you’re missing something from the last graf https://t.co/Mk5Xi74Nhq
— Joe Gabriel Simonson (@SaysSimonson) August 28, 2020
Oh, well, now that you mention it, the fact that Joseph Rosenbaum was allegedly trying to grab Rittenhouse’s gun does seem significant.
— 𝖇𝖊𝖓 (@alonewolfcub) August 28, 2020
Pesky details can be so … pesky.
That wasn’t all. Feels like you’re leaving out an important detail or two.
— Taro Tsujimoto (@RCannon74) August 28, 2020
Seems like a gross mischaracterization of the situation.
— HowzIt (@BGHowZit) August 28, 2020
It just feels misleading to say he was just defending himself from a bag when testimony by a witness disputes that
— Joe Gabriel Simonson (@SaysSimonson) August 28, 2020
That’s because it is misleading.
reading is fun-da-mental 🙂
— Charles Fain Lehman (@CharlesFLehman) August 28, 2020
