Boston Arts Commission Votes to Remove Memorial Funded by Freed Slaves

5 mins read


AP featured image
In this Nov. 18, 2017 photo a statue of Abraham Lincoln is shown outside the Lincoln Museum in Hodgenville, Ky. (Christopher Sullivan via AP)

 

On Tuesday night, Boston’s arts commission took a vote on whether to remove a statue depicting a freed slave kneeling in front of President Abraham Lincoln.

The commission agreed unanimously to take it down.

As reported by The Associated Press, complaints were fielded about the Emancipation Memorial, otherwise known as the Freedman’s Memorial or the Emancipation Group.

If it looks familiar to you, that may be due to its identical twin seated in Washington D.C., which was erected in 1876.

Boston’s came three years later.

The statue, of course, is meant to champion the freeing of America’s slaves. But some have slammed the portrayal of a black man kneeling before the nation’s white leader.

The commission’s vice chairperson, Ekua Holmes, described Tuesday’s events thusly:

“What I heard today is that it hurts to look at this piece, and in the Boston landscape, we should not have works that bring shame to any groups of people.”

In a statement, Mayor Marty Walsh called the situation “clear”:

“After engaging in a public process, it’s clear that residents and visitors to Boston have been uncomfortable with this statue.”

That clarity may have been helped by a 12,000-signature petition demanding the work of art’s demise.

And Tuesday’s decision has been brewing for quite a while.

From the AP:

The memorial has been on Boston’s radar at least since 2018, when it launched a comprehensive review of whether public sculptures, monuments and other artworks reflected the city’s diversity and didn’t offend communities of color. The arts commission said it was paying extra attention to works with “problematic histories.”

“As we continue our work to make Boston a more equitable and just city,” the mayor said, “it’s important that we look at the stories being told by the public art in all of our neighborhoods.”

Meanwhile, as covered by RedState’s Nick Arama, the original D.C. installation’s had some issues itself.

Case in point (Language Warning):

About the sculpture’s portrayed scene, Nick observed thusly:

Abraham Lincoln himself might not have liked the positioning since he believed that no man should kneel but before God, and specifically told a freed slave who fell to his knees to thank him not to do that, but to thank God instead.

The D.C. statue was payed for by freed slaves, and Frederick Douglass gave a speech at its unveiling.

But now, in Boston, something created on behalf of those liberated from bondage will be removed, it would seem, in their honor.

Whatever one thinks of the monument’s depiction, its inscription — evidently — is far from accurate.

It reads:

“A race set free and the country at peace. Lincoln rests from his labors.”

Lincoln may have rested, but as for the other thing, I’d say we’ve got a ways to go yet.

-ALEX

 

See 3 more pieces from me:

Trump Signs an Executive Order to Defund States Which Don’t Protect Public Statues, Including Those of Jesus

Hollywood Star Denzel Washington Recalls the Moment He Gave His Life to Christ

New Approach to Leadership? Philadelphia Mayor Wants Threatened Christopher Columbus Statue Removed for ‘Public Safety’

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. 





Source link

Previous Story

Hong Kong police issue first arrest under China’s controversial security law

Next Story

San Francisco Archbishop on Toppling of Junipero Serra Statue: ‘That Is An Act of The Evil One’

Latest from COMMENTARY

TRUTH RIGHT IN YOUR INBOX!!!
JOIN OVER 35,000+ PATRIOTS IN RECEIVING REAL, ACCURATE, AND AMERICAN-CENTRIC NEWS!
Become a patriot!
Stand up to power, stand up to the establishment, and join us in the fight against the mainstream media!
Close