Judge chastises Bolton, but won’t block his book

3 mins read

Judge Royce Lamberth, a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C., has denied the Trump administration’s request to block publication of John Bolton’s book. Judge Lamberth, a conservative appointed by Ronald Reagan, found that publication risks U.S. national security by disclosing classified information. However, he concluded that, as he said at oral argument, “the horse is already out of the barn.”

Lamberth explained that the book’s details are now publicly available thanks to media reports, and that the whole thing could be be distributed via the internet even if he ruled that it can’t be published. Thus, he decided that “for reasons that hardly need to be stated, the Court will not order a nationwide seizure and destruction of a political memoir.”

Lamberth had harsh words for Bolton, however. He wrote:

[Bolton] opted out of the [national security] review process before its conclusion. Unilateral fast-tracking carried the benefit of publicity and sales, and the cost of substantial risk exposure.

This was Bolton’s bet: If he is right and the book does not contain classified information, he keeps the upside mentioned above; but if he is wrong, he stands to lose his profits from the book deal, exposes himself to criminal liability, and imperils national security. Bolton was wrong.

(Emphasis added)

Bolton was also dishonorable, in my view. Unlike some of Bolton’s conservative critics, I don’t have a problem with him writing a kiss-and-tell memoir, provided the account is truthful and he fully complies with the procedural requirements that exist to protect our national security.

But Judge Lamberth, a respected jurist, has concluded that Bolton did not fully comply.

Bolton’s dishonorable behavior should color our view of the veracity of his account — an account that, if press reports of it are accurate — was already subject to question in my view.

A few days ago, I wrote:

I respect John Bolton, but wonder whether the bad taste his experience at the White House left in his mouth has undercut the objectivity of his account.

I would now amend that statement to delete the part about respect and change “wonder whether” to “believe.”

Source link

Previous Story

Second Night of Shooting at Black Lives Matter Vigil in Atlanta, Man Attacked By Mob for Filming (VIDEOS)

Next Story

‘Cheering foreign interference’? AOC thrilled Trump ‘got ROCKED by teens’ using Chinese-owned TikTok to flood his campaign with fake ticket requests

Latest from OPINION

Become a patriot!
Stand up to power, stand up to the establishment, and join us in the fight against the mainstream media!